<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Cut Out and Keep Guide to Web 2.0</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecla01/archive/2008/12/31/cut-out-and-keep-guide-to-web-2-0.aspx</link><description>Catching up on a few posts I found languishing in my drafts. I like this How to win by using Web 2.0 from the Financial Times, not least because it’s the last place I expected to find it. Without Twitter on there (it should be in the top box) it all seems</description><dc:language>en-GB</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Cut Out and Keep Guide to Web 2.0</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecla01/archive/2008/12/31/cut-out-and-keep-guide-to-web-2-0.aspx#9260302</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 15:53:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9260302</guid><dc:creator>Paul Fabretti</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry Steve, but this is the kind of stuff that only ever makes sense to the jobsworth's that create it (but FYI it does kinda make sense!)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Can't helping thinking that graphs like this serve only to make the author look like they understand what's going on by pigeon-holing everything they DO know about.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>