<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Steve Cook's WebLog : Architecture Edition</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecook/archive/tags/Architecture+Edition/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: Architecture Edition</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>The Oslo team are implementing UML 2</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecook/archive/2009/05/28/the-oslo-team-are-implementing-uml-2.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 13:23:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9646733</guid><dc:creator>Steve Cook</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecook/comments/9646733.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecook/commentrss.aspx?PostID=9646733</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecook/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=9646733</wfw:comment><description>&lt;P&gt;Keith Short has &lt;A href="http://blogs.msdn.com/keith_short/archive/2009/05/26/oslo-and-uml.aspx" mce_href="http://blogs.msdn.com/keith_short/archive/2009/05/26/oslo-and-uml.aspx"&gt;announced&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;that the next Oslo CTP will include support for loading UML models into the Oslo repository.&amp;nbsp; I've been helping Keith and his team to unravel some of the complexities of the UML specification.&amp;nbsp; As Keith says,&amp;nbsp;in due course we plan to be able to store UML models created using the Architecture Edition UML tools in the Oslo repository.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9646733" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecook/archive/tags/UML/default.aspx">UML</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecook/archive/tags/Architecture+Edition/default.aspx">Architecture Edition</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecook/archive/tags/Oslo/default.aspx">Oslo</category></item><item><title>VS 2010 DSL SDK Beta1</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecook/archive/2009/05/22/vs-2010-dsl-sdk-beta1.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 11:16:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9634854</guid><dc:creator>Steve Cook</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecook/comments/9634854.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecook/commentrss.aspx?PostID=9634854</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecook/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=9634854</wfw:comment><description>Following close on the heels of VS2010 Beta1, we've announced the corresponding DSL SDK (oh those acronyms) - see &lt;A href="http://blogs.msdn.com/jmprieur/archive/2009/05/22/announcing-the-visual-studio-2010-dsl-sdk-beta-1.aspx" mce_href="http://blogs.msdn.com/jmprieur/archive/2009/05/22/announcing-the-visual-studio-2010-dsl-sdk-beta-1.aspx"&gt;Jean-Marc's blog&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9634854" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecook/archive/tags/DSL+Tools/default.aspx">DSL Tools</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecook/archive/tags/Architecture+Edition/default.aspx">Architecture Edition</category></item><item><title>Ages of silence</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecook/archive/2009/05/21/ages-of-silence.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 12:53:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9633595</guid><dc:creator>Steve Cook</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecook/comments/9633595.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecook/commentrss.aspx?PostID=9633595</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecook/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=9633595</wfw:comment><description>&lt;P&gt;I see I haven't written anything here since February.&amp;nbsp; I've been very busy on two main fronts - lots of work on getting Team Architect ready for Beta 1 of Visual Studio Team System 2010, as well lots of work on making changes to the Components part of the forthcoming UML 2.3 specification.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Well, Beta 1 is &lt;A href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-gb/vstudio/dd582936.aspx" mce_href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-gb/vstudio/dd582936.aspx"&gt;out now&lt;/A&gt;.&amp;nbsp; We use Visual Studio to build itself (we call it "&lt;A href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dogfooding"&gt;dogfooding&lt;/A&gt;", a typically Microsoftian neologism), and one of the things that sometimes slows us down is performance.&amp;nbsp; Rico Mariani always has interesting things to say about this, including &lt;A href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ricom/archive/2009/05/20/visual-studio-10-your-performance-feedback-plus-beta-1.aspx" mce_href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ricom/archive/2009/05/20/visual-studio-10-your-performance-feedback-plus-beta-1.aspx"&gt;now&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'll write some details about the UML Component changes over the next few weeks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9633595" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecook/archive/tags/UML/default.aspx">UML</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecook/archive/tags/Architecture+Edition/default.aspx">Architecture Edition</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecook/archive/tags/VSTS/default.aspx">VSTS</category></item><item><title>Alan is blogging again</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecook/archive/2009/02/02/alan-is-blogging-again.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 14:49:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9390365</guid><dc:creator>Steve Cook</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecook/comments/9390365.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecook/commentrss.aspx?PostID=9390365</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecook/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=9390365</wfw:comment><description>&lt;A href="http://blogs.msdn.com/alancameronwills/" mce_href="http://blogs.msdn.com/alancameronwills/"&gt;Alan Cameron Wills&lt;/A&gt; has started blogging about UML for Agile Development. This should be interesting.&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9390365" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecook/archive/tags/UML/default.aspx">UML</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecook/archive/tags/Architecture+Edition/default.aspx">Architecture Edition</category></item><item><title>Explicit Design</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecook/archive/2008/11/27/explicit-design.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 18:26:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9146889</guid><dc:creator>Steve Cook</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecook/comments/9146889.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecook/commentrss.aspx?PostID=9146889</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecook/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=9146889</wfw:comment><description>&lt;A href="http://blogs.msdn.com/camerons/" mce_href="http://blogs.msdn.com/camerons/"&gt;Cameron&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;has been blogging about new features in our product.. In &lt;A href="http://blogs.msdn.com/camerons/archive/2008/11/10/testing-draft-to-blog.aspx" mce_href="http://blogs.msdn.com/camerons/archive/2008/11/10/testing-draft-to-blog.aspx"&gt;a recent post&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;he used the term Explicit Design.&amp;nbsp; I've been reflecting on this, and I&amp;nbsp;like it.&amp;nbsp;In software development we really do need to capture design data that is not just the code, but should be saved and versioned just like the code.&amp;nbsp; What do we call it?&amp;nbsp; We could call it "models" but "model" and "model driven development" are subject to so much historical baggage and methodology and &lt;A href="http://blogs.msdn.com/keith_short/archive/2008/11/18/comments-on-communication-between-doug-purdy-and-lars-corneliussen.aspx"&gt;terminology arguments&lt;/A&gt;.&amp;nbsp; "Model" just seems to imply baked-in code generation and round tripping, when there is so much more that you can do with it: planning, verifying, testing, refactoring. We need new vocabulary that represents our ability to capture versioned design data at a more abstract level than the code without simultaneously implying the history of CASE.&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9146889" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecook/archive/tags/DSL+Tools/default.aspx">DSL Tools</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecook/archive/tags/UML/default.aspx">UML</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecook/archive/tags/Architecture+Edition/default.aspx">Architecture Edition</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecook/archive/tags/VSTS/default.aspx">VSTS</category></item><item><title>Architecture Edition Videos</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecook/archive/2008/10/21/architecture-edition-videos.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 15:36:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9009442</guid><dc:creator>Steve Cook</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecook/comments/9009442.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecook/commentrss.aspx?PostID=9009442</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecook/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=9009442</wfw:comment><description>&lt;P&gt;If you want more details about the tools we're building, &lt;A href="http://blogs.msdn.com/camerons/" mce_href="http://blogs.msdn.com/camerons/"&gt;Cameron Skinner&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;gives an &lt;A href="http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/VisualStudio/Cameron-Skinner-Visual-Studio-Team-System-2010-Architecture/" mce_href="http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/VisualStudio/Cameron-Skinner-Visual-Studio-Team-System-2010-Architecture/"&gt;overview&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;of the next version of Team System Architecture Edition.&amp;nbsp; Mark Groves explains and demos&amp;nbsp;the logical part of the story in &lt;A href="http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/VisualStudio/Top-down-design-with-Visual-Studio-Team-System-2010/" mce_href="http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/VisualStudio/Top-down-design-with-Visual-Studio-Team-System-2010/"&gt;Top-Down Design&lt;/A&gt;, and Suhail Dutta explains and demos the physical part of the story with &lt;A href="http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/VisualStudio/Bottom-up-Design-with-Visual-Studio-Team-System-2010-Architect/" mce_href="http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/VisualStudio/Bottom-up-Design-with-Visual-Studio-Team-System-2010-Architect/"&gt;Bottom-Up Design&lt;/A&gt;.&amp;nbsp; All are to be found on Brian Keller's &lt;A href="http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/VisualStudio/Visual-Studio-Team-System-2010-Week-on-Channel-9/" mce_href="http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/VisualStudio/Visual-Studio-Team-System-2010-Week-on-Channel-9/"&gt;Visual Studio Team System 2010 week on Channel 9&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9009442" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecook/archive/tags/UML/default.aspx">UML</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecook/archive/tags/Architecture+Edition/default.aspx">Architecture Edition</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecook/archive/tags/VSTS/default.aspx">VSTS</category></item></channel></rss>