<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Evolution or Revolution for moving to offline architectures</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/stevelasker/archive/2008/10/18/evolution-or-revolution-for-moving-to-offline-architectures.aspx</link><description>There's been a lot of talk, momentum and questioning for where and how occasionally connected designs fit into the application landscape. There have been a lot of questions for "if and how" developers can take their existing apps "offline". There have</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Books and Magazines Blog  &amp;raquo; Archive   &amp;raquo; Evolution or Revolution for moving to offline architectures</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/stevelasker/archive/2008/10/18/evolution-or-revolution-for-moving-to-offline-architectures.aspx#9004237</link><pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 06:40:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9004237</guid><dc:creator>Books and Magazines Blog  &amp;raquo; Archive   &amp;raquo; Evolution or Revolution for moving to offline architectures</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.pigmig.com/evolution-or-revolution-for-moving-to-offline-architectures"&gt;http://www.pigmig.com/evolution-or-revolution-for-moving-to-offline-architectures&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>