<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>.Net Compact Framework: Versioning, Strong Names and the Global Assembly Cache – Part 2</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/stevenpr/archive/2005/01/05/347353.aspx</link><description>Last summer I posted an article that described the basic differences between the .Net Compact Framework and the full .Net Framework with respect to versioning and deployment (see http://blogs.msdn.com/stevenpr/archive/2004/06/30/170289.aspx ). Recently,</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>.NET CF Versioning</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/stevenpr/archive/2005/01/05/347353.aspx#347412</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2005 07:11:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:347412</guid><dc:creator>Mikel Berger</dc:creator><description>More reading for CPT 355 deployment lectures. http://weblogs.asp.net/stevenpr/archive/2005/01/05/347353.aspx which is a Part 2 to this post http://blogs.msdn.com/stevenpr/archive/2004/06/30/170289.aspx...</description></item><item><title>.NET Compact Framework Version Compatibility</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/stevenpr/archive/2005/01/05/347353.aspx#348246</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2005 09:48:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:348246</guid><dc:creator>Scott Holden's Blog</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>.NET Compact Framework Version Compatibility</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/stevenpr/archive/2005/01/05/347353.aspx#348250</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2005 09:53:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:348250</guid><dc:creator>Scott Holden's Blog</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>c strong name example</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/stevenpr/archive/2005/01/05/347353.aspx#8472169</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 17:29:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8472169</guid><dc:creator>c strong name example</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://ryann.unoccupiedmedia.info/cstrongnameexample.html"&gt;http://ryann.unoccupiedmedia.info/cstrongnameexample.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Sharing Assemblies | keyongtech</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/stevenpr/archive/2005/01/05/347353.aspx#9361882</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 06:04:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9361882</guid><dc:creator>Sharing Assemblies | keyongtech</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.keyongtech.com/469757-sharing-assemblies"&gt;http://www.keyongtech.com/469757-sharing-assemblies&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>BizTalk RFID Mobile and Providers in GAC</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/stevenpr/archive/2005/01/05/347353.aspx#9539820</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 11:58:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9539820</guid><dc:creator>Arpit Nand's Weblog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the best practices for mobile providers is that they should be registered in .NET CF’s Global&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>