<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Testing A Daily Build</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/steverowe/archive/2007/10/25/testing-a-daily-build.aspx</link><description>It is becoming accepted in the industry that teams should produce a build on a daily basis. Every project at Microsoft does this as do most projects elsewhere. If you happen to be on a project that does not, I suggest you work to get one implemented soon.</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Computers &amp;raquo; Testing A Daily Build</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/steverowe/archive/2007/10/25/testing-a-daily-build.aspx#5671530</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:54:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:5671530</guid><dc:creator>Computers » Testing A Daily Build</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.soundpages.net/computers/?p=4742"&gt;http://www.soundpages.net/computers/?p=4742&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Testing A Daily Build</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/steverowe/archive/2007/10/25/testing-a-daily-build.aspx#5677549</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 22:55:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:5677549</guid><dc:creator>Max Pool</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Steve,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It appears you are running a very common MSFT daily build / test plan (I worked there 3 years). &amp;nbsp; So I am going to challenge you and ask why not more frequent?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Continuous Integration, run your BATs and BVTs at each checkin, or better before developers checkin...&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Testing A Daily Build</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/steverowe/archive/2007/10/25/testing-a-daily-build.aspx#5686580</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 10:14:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:5686580</guid><dc:creator>SteveRowe</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;We do often spin a build for each checkin (or batch of checkins), but there are official builds we expect people to install and play with and these are what I'm talking about here. &amp;nbsp;You make a very good point that building (and testing) on a continuous basis is easily possible and very valuable.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>VSTS Links - 10/26/2007</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/steverowe/archive/2007/10/25/testing-a-daily-build.aspx#5691923</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:12:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:5691923</guid><dc:creator>Team System News</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Jeff Beehler on Check out the new Tester Center on MSDN and VS2008 Beta2 VPCs expiring prematurely. Martin...&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Testing A Daily Build</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/steverowe/archive/2007/10/25/testing-a-daily-build.aspx#5697377</link><pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 03:28:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:5697377</guid><dc:creator>RyanBemrose</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Max - For what it's worth, there is no difference between a daily build and a continuous rolling build when your product really does take 24 hours to build.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>