http://blogs.msdn.com/steverowe/archive/2008/10/02/james-whittaker-on-why-ms-software-sucks-despite-our-testing.aspxA friend turned me on to this post by James Whittaker.&#160; I didn't know he had a blog so now I'm excited to read it.&#160; He has a lot of really interesting things to say on testing so I encourage you to read his blog (now linked on the left) if youen-USCommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)http://blogs.msdn.com/steverowe/archive/2008/10/02/james-whittaker-on-why-ms-software-sucks-despite-our-testing.aspx#8973944Thu, 02 Oct 2008 20:02:42 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8973944Doug<p>Software problems go far beyond what can be found through a test.</p> <p>When the specification has a problem at test will only tell you that the program works perfectly according to the specification without crashing. &nbsp;The test will not tell you that the application is not doing what people what it to do.</p> <p>How do you give them what they need instead of what they want?</p> http://blogs.msdn.com/steverowe/archive/2008/10/02/james-whittaker-on-why-ms-software-sucks-despite-our-testing.aspx#9015291Sat, 25 Oct 2008 00:43:45 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9015291Director<p>Hmm, maybe somebody should apply the Five Why's from the later post?</p>