Transactional Memory on Channel 9http://blogs.msdn.com/stmteam/archive/2008/12/31/transactional-memory-on-channel-9.aspxDana and I have been talking with Charles from channel 9 about transactional memory. Please check out the video . We like to call it “the TM holiday special” :-) Charles has also interviewed our indefatigable QA-engineer-at-large Chris Dern on the novelen-USCommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)Transactional Memory on Channel 9 | Coded Stylehttp://blogs.msdn.com/stmteam/archive/2008/12/31/transactional-memory-on-channel-9.aspx#9257874Wed, 31 Dec 2008 04:21:47 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9257874Transactional Memory on Channel 9 | Coded Style<p>PingBack from <a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.codedstyle.com/transactional-memory-on-channel-9/">http://www.codedstyle.com/transactional-memory-on-channel-9/</a></p> re: Transactional Memory on Channel 9http://blogs.msdn.com/stmteam/archive/2008/12/31/transactional-memory-on-channel-9.aspx#9459124Thu, 05 Mar 2009 03:34:44 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9459124Brett Morgan<p>The attack on Agents in that video is distressing, mainly in the way that it displays a complete disregard for what is already known in the field. Yes we do scale actors down to the &quot;object&quot;. It works, and works well.</p> <p>Look up Concurrency Oriented Programming and do some reading. Especially Joe Armstrong's Programming Erlang, published by the PragProg guys.</p> <p><a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.pragprog.com/titles/jaerlang/programming-erlang">http://www.pragprog.com/titles/jaerlang/programming-erlang</a></p>