<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Using Code Analysis with Silverlight</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/synergist/archive/2008/08/04/using-code-analysis-with-silverlight.aspx</link><description>Ever since I was in the C++ world, I have been enamored with code analysis tools;&amp;#160; I used to live by PC-Lint .&amp;#160; So since I started using C# a few years ago code analysis was something that I wanted to integrate into my C# coding practice as</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Links for August 5th 2008 | .Net</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/synergist/archive/2008/08/04/using-code-analysis-with-silverlight.aspx#8836163</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 08:46:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8836163</guid><dc:creator>Links for August 5th 2008 | .Net</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blog.kantikalyan.com/links-august-5th-2008/"&gt;http://blog.kantikalyan.com/links-august-5th-2008/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Silverlight Cream for August 10, 2008 -- #343</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/synergist/archive/2008/08/04/using-code-analysis-with-silverlight.aspx#8847369</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 04:13:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8847369</guid><dc:creator>Community Blogs</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Michael Washington with an add-on for SL Desktop already, Mike Snow beginning Terrain tutorials and applying&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Using Code Analysis with Silverlight</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/synergist/archive/2008/08/04/using-code-analysis-with-silverlight.aspx#8856943</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 11:42:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8856943</guid><dc:creator>steve</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;After fixing all that can be fixed in terms of exception constructors, wouldn't a [SuppressMessage] attribute with an appropriate Justification= be the cleaner way to go? (Short of writing stub classes to fake the serialization constructor, that is.)&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Using Code Analysis with Silverlight</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/synergist/archive/2008/08/04/using-code-analysis-with-silverlight.aspx#8904379</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 03:59:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8904379</guid><dc:creator>Jason Stangroome</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I think the Schema for the code analysis dictionary has inapropriate lower bounds for most elements.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I believe each of the Words, Unrecognized, Recognized, Deprecated, and Acronyms elements should have minOccurs=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At the moment a custom dictionary without at least one Unrecognized word is considered to violate the schema.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Using Code Analysis with Silverlight</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/synergist/archive/2008/08/04/using-code-analysis-with-silverlight.aspx#8906953</link><pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 00:35:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8906953</guid><dc:creator>Michael S. Scherotter</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Jason,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the suggestion. &amp;nbsp;I updated the schema file on the MSDN Code gallery.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Michael&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>