<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Threat Management the bigger picture</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/threatmodeling/archive/2008/05/29/threat-management-the-bigger-picture.aspx</link><description>Threat Modeling is one those &amp;#8216;sciences&amp;#8217; that is just now starting to gel into something that can be implemented in a semi-automated fashion.&amp;#160; With TAM /e, we have a good approach to threat modeling that is both easy on the development</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Threat Modeling - The Bigger Picture</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/threatmodeling/archive/2008/05/29/threat-management-the-bigger-picture.aspx#8557357</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 10:00:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8557357</guid><dc:creator>From Source to Secure</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I recently was in a bit of a conversation about Threat Modeling, it's future, and how it relates to Risk&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Threat Management the bigger picture</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/threatmodeling/archive/2008/05/29/threat-management-the-bigger-picture.aspx#8574766</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 11:28:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8574766</guid><dc:creator>dannyl</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;This is an excellent post. &amp;nbsp; The contribution of threat modeling to operational risk management is, I believe, in a formalized methodology of risk measurement and calculation. &amp;nbsp;Risk is not an an independent variable that can be estimated or observed. Risk is a dependent variable that is a function of asset value, vulnerabilities, threats that exploit the vulnerabilities and countermeasures that mitigate the vulnerabilities.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Current operational risk management systems are based on the notion that operational business processes have risk - and that risk is something to be estimated by employees and consultants and then rolled up. There are different ways different systems do this - using guided interviews or self-assessments - but at the end of the day, if you rollup a bunch of arbitrary risk estimates you will get an arbitrary risk management system.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is I believe where threat modeling comes in. It helps a company calculate risk in dollar terms and place it on the table together with other business decisions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The post also mentioned the risk of share prices crashing. Although threat modeling may not be relevant to modeling behavior of many-body problem such as thousands of different stock options being traded by millions of people - threat modeling may be relevant for the individual stock holder. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yes there is a threat that a stock may crash - the vulnerability is that you might still be holding the stock when that happens (since you are too busy at your day job to notice the change). &amp;nbsp;You mitigate the vulnerability with countermeasures (have someone monitor the stock for you, place an automatic sell order or diversify your portfolio with oil and energy stocks). &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>