Enterprise Library and .NET 2.0: What's the deal?

re: Enterprise Library and .NET 2.0: What's the deal?

Jason — Wed, 01 Jun 2005 13:03:17 GMT

This sounds reasonable. The application blocks fill gaps in the logic, Microsoft watches how the blocks are used and puts the functionality into the next release. Proper software evolution!

I would imagine a true Enterprise Library V2 will be some time away as it takes time to understand what the new framework provides.

This just means that developers who use V1 on 2005 will eventually have to put up with newbies saying "why are you doing it this way, when 2005 does it for you?"

Enterprise Library vs. .NET 2.0

Chris Breisch — Wed, 01 Jun 2005 16:00:54 GMT

Enterprise Library V2 : The Real Deal (Maybe)

Being Scott Densmore — Wed, 01 Jun 2005 16:08:17 GMT

I have been holding off saying anything since Tom is in charge of &ldquo;messaging&rdquo; (I just type...

re: Enterprise Library and .NET 2.0: What's the deal?

Chris Woodruff — Wed, 01 Jun 2005 16:12:35 GMT

Thanks Tom for the update. Is there any chance to have a post identifying which existing Blocks will have the most changes to them? I am curious since .NET 2.0 is light years ahead of 1.1 and the effects that it will have with EntLib.

Thanks again for the post. Nice to see the feedback from the p&p group.

Enterprise Library and .NET 2.0: What's the deal?

Sam Gentile's Blog — Wed, 01 Jun 2005 20:36:18 GMT

re: Enterprise Library and .NET 2.0: What's the deal?

Mike Gale — Wed, 01 Jun 2005 23:07:33 GMT

Great post.

Doing things right takes time. How often do we forget that?

re: Enterprise Library and .NET 2.0: What's the deal?

Chris Woodruff — Thu, 02 Jun 2005 02:34:30 GMT

Good things do take time. I am still learning and experimenting with the CF App Blocks. That made me very happy.

re: Enterprise Library and .NET 2.0: What's the deal?

Steve Trefethen — Thu, 02 Jun 2005 15:37:50 GMT

Hi Tom,
Thanks, this was a much needed explanation of where things stand WRT .NET 2.0.
-Steve

re: Enterprise Library and .NET 2.0: What's the deal?

Anonymous — Sun, 26 Jun 2005 05:05:29 GMT

I couldn't agree more with your assessment. It is so easy to move from 1.1 to 2.0 without even noticing all the remarkable changes in there (generics, wow!). Waiting a while to see (and later emulate) a library built to leverage those improvements is a small price to pay.

re: Enterprise Library and .NET 2.0: What's the deal?

sandeep — Tue, 28 Jun 2005 21:56:15 GMT

Tom,
any update on when we will see the first drop of the Ent Lib for 2.0 ?

Enterprise Library vs. .NET 2.0

Chris Breisch — Sun, 03 Jul 2005 23:27:30 GMT

EntLib &quot;June 2005&quot; and Whidbey Thoughts

TSHAK — Thu, 07 Jul 2005 23:28:45 GMT

As you are probably aware, Microsoft's patterns &amp; practices (aka PAG for Platform Architecture Guidance)...

EntLib June 2005 Thoughts

Darron's Notes — Fri, 08 Jul 2005 17:12:33 GMT

Tim posted his thoughs on EntLib June 2005 release today. Thanks Tim.
I'm one of those people who waited...

EntLib June 2005 Thoughts

Darron's Notes — Fri, 08 Jul 2005 20:08:14 GMT

Tim posted his thoughs on EntLib June 2005 release today. Thanks Tim.
I'm one of those people who waited...

Enterprise Library and .NET 2.0: What's the deal?

re: Enterprise Library and .NET 2.0: What's the deal?

Enterprise Library vs. .NET 2.0

Enterprise Library V2 : The Real Deal (Maybe)

re: Enterprise Library and .NET 2.0: What's the deal?

Enterprise Library and .NET 2.0: What's the deal?

re: Enterprise Library and .NET 2.0: What's the deal?

re: Enterprise Library and .NET 2.0: What's the deal?

re: Enterprise Library and .NET 2.0: What's the deal?

re: Enterprise Library and .NET 2.0: What's the deal?

re: Enterprise Library and .NET 2.0: What's the deal?

Enterprise Library vs. .NET 2.0

EntLib &amp;quot;June 2005&amp;quot; and Whidbey Thoughts

EntLib June 2005 Thoughts

EntLib June 2005 Thoughts

EntLib "June 2005" and Whidbey Thoughts