<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Client-side Code vs. Web 2.0</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/tonyschr/archive/2007/01/02/client-side-code-vs-web-2-0.aspx</link><description>As a developer who specializes in client-side applications, I can't help but be amused and somewhat puzzled by some of the types of web-based applications people come up with. A great example are web sites that help resize and crop digital photos. There</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Client-side Code vs. Web 2.0</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/tonyschr/archive/2007/01/02/client-side-code-vs-web-2-0.aspx#1402502</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 11:44:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1402502</guid><dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, I agree. While I like Web 2.0 sites a la Flickr, YouTube or online applications like webmailer, I dont see any benefit in using a Gump or OpenOffice online.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Not only the time needed for up/downloading the data is stressful - have you ever thought about safety? Cross side scripting attacs and other &amp;quot;fine&amp;quot; things could steal your valuable data you dont want to share.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Client-side Code vs. Web 2.0</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/tonyschr/archive/2007/01/02/client-side-code-vs-web-2-0.aspx#1405202</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 20:12:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1405202</guid><dc:creator>Andrew Sherman</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;They must want to be bought by flickr/yahoo type sites that already hold your photos&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Client-side Code vs. Web 2.0</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/tonyschr/archive/2007/01/02/client-side-code-vs-web-2-0.aspx#1441758</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 04:53:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1441758</guid><dc:creator>Murphy</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Here Here. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Go to &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.go2web20.net/"&gt;http://www.go2web20.net/&lt;/a&gt; if you want to see lots of useless Web 2.0 websites, although some are cool. One idea that amazes me is when someone writes a Web 2.0 app, that acts like an OS. Then they build in applications like email, and Word, Excel and so on. Why would I log in to a &amp;quot;Web OS&amp;quot; to access my email?&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>