<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Hyper-V: How to get the most from your virtualized disk performance</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/tvoellm/archive/2007/12/12/which-is-better-ide-or-scsi-windows-server-virtualization-08-code-name-viridian-controller-performance.aspx</link><description>There are two types of disk controllers that Hyper-V supports: SCSI and IDE. There are two IDE controllers and four SCSI controllers available. Each IDE controller can have two devices. You can not boot from a SCSI controller. This means an IDE disk will</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Hyper-V: How to get the most from your virtualized disk performance</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/tvoellm/archive/2007/12/12/which-is-better-ide-or-scsi-windows-server-virtualization-08-code-name-viridian-controller-performance.aspx#6784330</link><pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 22:22:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:6784330</guid><dc:creator>Rob McShinsky</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;You can not boot from a SCSI controller. &amp;nbsp;This means an IDE disk will be required.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So I have to boot from an virtual IDE drive meaning the OS has to be on the virtual IDE drive? &amp;nbsp;That can't be right can it?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rob&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>No boot from IDE</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/tvoellm/archive/2007/12/12/which-is-better-ide-or-scsi-windows-server-virtualization-08-code-name-viridian-controller-performance.aspx#6791514</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 21:22:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:6791514</guid><dc:creator>tvoellm</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes it is true you can not boot from SCSI. &amp;nbsp;Our virtual BIOS does not support this today. &amp;nbsp;It does support (always subject to change because this software is not RTM);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CD&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;IDE&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Legacy Network Adapter&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Floppy&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The root reason is SCSI in a synthetic device and there is no VMBUS until after boot.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &amp;nbsp;Tony&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Hyper-V: How to get the most from your virtualized disk performance</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/tvoellm/archive/2007/12/12/which-is-better-ide-or-scsi-windows-server-virtualization-08-code-name-viridian-controller-performance.aspx#6920550</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 18:52:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:6920550</guid><dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;You could support booting directly from the PV SCSI disk with something like extboot. &amp;nbsp;See &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blog.codemonkey.ws/2007/12/first-release-of-extboot.html"&gt;http://blog.codemonkey.ws/2007/12/first-release-of-extboot.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Hyper-V: How to get the most from your virtualized disk performance</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/tvoellm/archive/2007/12/12/which-is-better-ide-or-scsi-windows-server-virtualization-08-code-name-viridian-controller-performance.aspx#6927597</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 04:18:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:6927597</guid><dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Will the Scsi-boot be supported in RTM? &lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Hyper-V: How to get the most from your virtualized disk performance</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/tvoellm/archive/2007/12/12/which-is-better-ide-or-scsi-windows-server-virtualization-08-code-name-viridian-controller-performance.aspx#7015543</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 17:00:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7015543</guid><dc:creator>Kofler</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;And what about &amp;quot;seamless&amp;quot; Virtual Server to Hyper-V conversation. Only a marketing bluff?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Hyper-V: How to get the most from your virtualized disk performance</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/tvoellm/archive/2007/12/12/which-is-better-ide-or-scsi-windows-server-virtualization-08-code-name-viridian-controller-performance.aspx#8134408</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:39:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8134408</guid><dc:creator>Roberto</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Anthony,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As a former developer, I found the Hyper-V architecture really fantastic: it's elegant, intelligent e promising. From the developer point of view, you guys have done an excellent job (that has room for improvements, of course). Things like the virtual switch were really smart ideas.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But, from the infrastructure point of view, things like &amp;quot;won't boot from SCSI disks&amp;quot; are inadmissible. Statements like these (about the SCSI boot) can just rise another statement: &amp;quot;You gotta be kidding&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a product built for Datacenters, there's no such thing as &amp;quot;won't boot from SCSI disk&amp;quot;. Even saying that Windows Server 2008 is not exclusively for Datacenters, we can fool ourselves thinking that it THERE (the Datacenters) where it will be deployed most times - it's an obvius move. If you (a &amp;quot;generic&amp;quot; you) want to compete with VMWare and Virtual Iron, this kind of problem HAS TO disappear. It IS a showstopper. Many people excited about Hyper-V (including me) WILL NOT use it in their Datacenters with this kind of bug or problem or &amp;quot;collateral effect&amp;quot;. There is no way to convince IT staff to add an IDE disk to a virtual machine just to boot - or worse: to move the OS to an IDE disk to do that. There is simply NO chance, and I'm not speaking only for myself...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Come on - you guys are doing an excellent job, and you (the team) can surelly find some clever solution for this. The SCSI driver could run emulated until the VMBus can be loaded, or the BIOS could do the boot part until the VMBus is up - I don't know how, but one thing is pretty sure in the corporate market for Hyper-V: you guys will HAVE to find a way..&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Roberto P.R.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Hyper-V: How to get the most from your virtualized disk performance</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/tvoellm/archive/2007/12/12/which-is-better-ide-or-scsi-windows-server-virtualization-08-code-name-viridian-controller-performance.aspx#8419057</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:42:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8419057</guid><dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;This really irritates me as well. I wanted to migrate from VMWare Server to Hyper-V, now I am not sure I can/will. Repair installs on an existing server just don't make sense. There should be a way to support &amp;quot;legacy&amp;quot; SCSI drives at the very least.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Device Access in Hyper-V</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/tvoellm/archive/2007/12/12/which-is-better-ide-or-scsi-windows-server-virtualization-08-code-name-viridian-controller-performance.aspx#8486631</link><pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 13:05:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8486631</guid><dc:creator>Virtualization Blogs</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Ok. This is what I&amp;amp;#39;ve learned so far about device access in Hyper-V. For device access in Hyper-V&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Hyper-V: How to get the most from your virtualized disk performance</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/tvoellm/archive/2007/12/12/which-is-better-ide-or-scsi-windows-server-virtualization-08-code-name-viridian-controller-performance.aspx#8517905</link><pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 06:44:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8517905</guid><dc:creator>mescwb</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;Does a VHD created attached to a virtual scsi can be mounted in a virtual ide?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;[[Tony's Reply]]&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Let me try and parse this.&amp;nbsp; Are you asking if a VHD&amp;nbsp;attached to a VM on the Virtual&amp;nbsp;SCSI&amp;nbsp;actually reside on an IDE disk?&amp;nbsp; If so&amp;nbsp;the answer is yes.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;VHD's can also reside in LUNs, ...&amp;nbsp; The actual disk /&amp;nbsp;LUN&amp;nbsp;can be different from the&amp;nbsp;virtual controller.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Hyper-V: How to get the most from your virtualized disk performance</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/tvoellm/archive/2007/12/12/which-is-better-ide-or-scsi-windows-server-virtualization-08-code-name-viridian-controller-performance.aspx#8568597</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 05:18:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8568597</guid><dc:creator>Jimmy</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;What he's actually asking is if a VHD is attached to a SCSI virtual controller, can it be attached to an IDE virtual controller later?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;[Tony's Reply]&amp;nbsp; VHD's have no knowledge of the virtual interface you connect them to.&amp;nbsp; You can attach SCSI now and IDE later.&lt;/P&gt;</description></item><item><title>SCSI performance using Fibre channel on host not good</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/tvoellm/archive/2007/12/12/which-is-better-ide-or-scsi-windows-server-virtualization-08-code-name-viridian-controller-performance.aspx#9415317</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 21:04:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9415317</guid><dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have an issue that we are using IBM Storage Manager v10 on the 2008 host and find that the virtual SCSI driver within Hyper-V to be worse performance then IDE driver as a data drive. our fibre channel is using MPIO windows x64 driver on the host connecting to a DS4300 hwne using the SCSI driver we were getting 10 MB/s performance, (single drive RAID 1 array) on the IDE driver we are getting 40 Mb/sec (which is closer to the real performance&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;any ideas ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;----&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;Tony's reply - What type of disk are you using the IDE and SCSI?&amp;nbsp; Fixed / Diff&amp;nbsp;/ VHD?&amp;nbsp; Is this WS08 Hyper-V or WS08R2?&lt;/P&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Hyper-V: How to get the most from your virtualized disk performance</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/tvoellm/archive/2007/12/12/which-is-better-ide-or-scsi-windows-server-virtualization-08-code-name-viridian-controller-performance.aspx#9618509</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 16:34:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9618509</guid><dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;Has the "no booting from SCSI in Hyper-V" been fixed yet? &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;[Tony's Reply] In Windows Server 2008 R2 we only support booting from Virtual IDE.&amp;nbsp; In my experience having the OS on&amp;nbsp;virtual IDE has had little overall impact on performance.&amp;nbsp; I do recommend putting data on virtual SCSI drives.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;Is there something specific you have measured or seen?&lt;/P&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>