<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The problem of backscatter, part 4 - What the RFC says</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/tzink/archive/2008/07/06/the-problem-of-backscatter-part-4-what-the-rfc-says.aspx</link><description>As one of the commenters in my previous post mentioned, RFC 3464 specifies the content-type for Delivery Status Notifications. This isn't a series about the RFC specification so I shall attempt to summarize it as best I can. This post is mostly a repost</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>a-foton &amp;raquo; The problem of backscatter, part 4 - What the RFC says</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/tzink/archive/2008/07/06/the-problem-of-backscatter-part-4-what-the-rfc-says.aspx#8700409</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 08:45:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8700409</guid><dc:creator>a-foton &amp;raquo; The problem of backscatter, part 4 - What the RFC says</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blog.a-foton.ru/2008/07/the-problem-of-backscatter-part-4-what-the-rfc-says/"&gt;http://blog.a-foton.ru/2008/07/the-problem-of-backscatter-part-4-what-the-rfc-says/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>