<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Slightly Useful Ramblings Of a SDE/T</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/default.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>How do I retrieve a list of all web services on a machine?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/2009/10/27/how-do-i-retrieve-a-list-of-all-web-services-on-a-machine.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:16:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9913785</guid><dc:creator>Vijai Kalyan</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/comments/9913785.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/commentrss.aspx?PostID=9913785</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=9913785</wfw:comment><description>If I have a machine say FOO and I want to retrieve all web services on that machine how do I do it? I can use WS-Discovery and I know how to do this with the .NET 4.0 Discovery API. However, the only sample I could find is multicast, which in my use case...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/2009/10/27/how-do-i-retrieve-a-list-of-all-web-services-on-a-machine.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9913785" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/discovery/default.aspx">discovery</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/services/default.aspx">services</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/web/default.aspx">web</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/wcf/default.aspx">wcf</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/WS-Discovery/default.aspx">WS-Discovery</category></item><item><title>Redirecting Standard Error &amp; Output For A Child Process</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/2009/10/05/redirecting-standard-error-output-for-a-child-process.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 03:09:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9903487</guid><dc:creator>Vijai Kalyan</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/comments/9903487.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/commentrss.aspx?PostID=9903487</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=9903487</wfw:comment><description>If your application or library wants to kick off a child process C and you want to redirect standard output and error, this is what you do: ProcessStartInfo psi = new ProcessStartInfo (); psi.Arguments = this .CreateArgumentsString(); psi.FileName = this...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/2009/10/05/redirecting-standard-error-output-for-a-child-process.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9903487" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/output/default.aspx">output</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/error/default.aspx">error</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/redirect/default.aspx">redirect</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/asynchronous/default.aspx">asynchronous</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/console/default.aspx">console</category></item><item><title>Debuggee Process Terminated Abruptly</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/2009/10/02/debuggee-process-terminated-abruptly.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 19:32:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9902436</guid><dc:creator>Vijai Kalyan</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/comments/9902436.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/commentrss.aspx?PostID=9902436</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=9902436</wfw:comment><description>I have been getting this error lately when trying to debug a test. I would be stepping over line by line and suddenly the debuggee process will exit suddenly. The proces exits with the error code is -2147023895 (0x800703e9). There are only a few reasons...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/2009/10/02/debuggee-process-terminated-abruptly.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9902436" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/debugger/default.aspx">debugger</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/0x800703e9/default.aspx">0x800703e9</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/attribute/default.aspx">attribute</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/overflow/default.aspx">overflow</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/stack/default.aspx">stack</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/-2147023895/default.aspx">-2147023895</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/display/default.aspx">display</category></item><item><title>IGNORE_DUP_KEY, LINQ &amp; Deadlocks</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/2008/11/11/ignore-dup-key-and-linq.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 06:16:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9061252</guid><dc:creator>Vijai Kalyan</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/comments/9061252.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/commentrss.aspx?PostID=9061252</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=9061252</wfw:comment><description>I am working on a project. The idea is to persist stack trace information for each test failure in a database so that we can automate/facilitate analysis of related test failures. For example, we can query for all tests that fail at a particular method...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/2008/11/11/ignore-dup-key-and-linq.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9061252" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/IGNORE_5F00_DUP_5F00_KEY/default.aspx">IGNORE_DUP_KEY</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/LINQ/default.aspx">LINQ</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/DEADLOCK/default.aspx">DEADLOCK</category></item><item><title>Implementing a Custom Test Type - Part 3 (Dissecting the MyTest Sample - 1)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/2008/09/19/implementing-a-custom-test-type-part-3-dissecting-the-mytest-sample-1.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 03:13:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8959617</guid><dc:creator>Vijai Kalyan</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/comments/8959617.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/commentrss.aspx?PostID=8959617</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=8959617</wfw:comment><description>This post deals with the MyTest sample. I will start at the beginning of time. Pre Requisites I copied over the MyTest folder in the Visual Studio SDK to a separate directory. In doing so, I discovered some issues with the MyTestUI project. You will have...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/2008/09/19/implementing-a-custom-test-type-part-3-dissecting-the-mytest-sample-1.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8959617" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/tfs/default.aspx">tfs</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/test+type/default.aspx">test type</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/mytest/default.aspx">mytest</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/extensibility/default.aspx">extensibility</category></item><item><title>Implementing a Custom Test Type - Part 2</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/2008/09/16/implementing-a-custom-test-type-part-2.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 00:56:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8954467</guid><dc:creator>Vijai Kalyan</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/comments/8954467.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/commentrss.aspx?PostID=8954467</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=8954467</wfw:comment><description>I have been investigating this topic for the past couple of days. Not much progress, but some interesting things to note. It might be an illuminating experience to use .NET Reflector to disassembly and study the unit test type implementation. The relevant...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/2008/09/16/implementing-a-custom-test-type-part-2.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8954467" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/visual+studio/default.aspx">visual studio</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/tfs/default.aspx">tfs</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/mstest/default.aspx">mstest</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/custom+test+type/default.aspx">custom test type</category></item><item><title>How To Get Native Processor Architecture</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/2008/08/20/how-to-get-native-processor-architecture.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 05:55:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8883208</guid><dc:creator>Vijai Kalyan</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/comments/8883208.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/commentrss.aspx?PostID=8883208</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=8883208</wfw:comment><description>As anyone who has been looking at my blog knows, I have been mostly working on VS integration of the test tools used in our team (apart from setting up and managing TFS for the builds and various other initiatives.) Anyway, so, I started to author a project...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/2008/08/20/how-to-get-native-processor-architecture.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8883208" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/64+bit/default.aspx">64 bit</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/SYSTEM_5F00_INFO/default.aspx">SYSTEM_INFO</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/32+bit/default.aspx">32 bit</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/processor+architecture/default.aspx">processor architecture</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/GetNativeSystemInfo/default.aspx">GetNativeSystemInfo</category></item><item><title>Implementing a Custom Test Type - Part 1</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/2008/08/01/implementing-a-custom-test-type-part-1.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 22:34:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8801700</guid><dc:creator>Vijai Kalyan</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/comments/8801700.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/commentrss.aspx?PostID=8801700</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=8801700</wfw:comment><description>Introduction This and the next few blog posts will be focussed on implementing a custom test type for Visual Studio 2008. We have an internal tool that our team uses for testing quite extensively and which pre-dates the testing capabilities introduced...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/2008/08/01/implementing-a-custom-test-type-part-1.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8801700" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ideas For The Next Generation Of Programming Languages</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/2008/05/28/ideas-for-the-next-generation-of-programming-languages.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 03:33:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8557128</guid><dc:creator>Vijai Kalyan</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/comments/8557128.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/commentrss.aspx?PostID=8557128</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=8557128</wfw:comment><description>This blog post deals with a vareity of things I feel would be nice to have features in the next generation of programming languages. I keep learning about compiler technology and I am hoping that in the next few years, I will be able to build a compiler...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/2008/05/28/ideas-for-the-next-generation-of-programming-languages.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8557128" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/visual+studio/default.aspx">visual studio</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/future/default.aspx">future</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/programming+language/default.aspx">programming language</category></item><item><title>Duh! InitializeShapeFields is only invoked once!</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/2008/05/27/duh-initializeshapefields-is-only-invoked-once.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 09:44:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8556191</guid><dc:creator>Vijai Kalyan</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/comments/8556191.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/commentrss.aspx?PostID=8556191</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=8556191</wfw:comment><description>Beware!!! The method InitializeShapeFields appears in each shape class that is generated by the DSL tools. However, this method is only invoked ONCE per shape. It is due to this code /// &amp;lt;summary&amp;gt; /// Per-class ShapeFields for this shape. /// &amp;lt;/summary&amp;gt;...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/2008/05/27/duh-initializeshapefields-is-only-invoked-once.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8556191" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/dsl+tools/default.aspx">dsl tools</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/visual+studio/default.aspx">visual studio</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/singe+instance/default.aspx">singe instance</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/shape+fields/default.aspx">shape fields</category></item><item><title>Auto Layout Diagram</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/2008/05/26/auto-layout-diagram.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 15:30:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8552347</guid><dc:creator>Vijai Kalyan</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/comments/8552347.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/commentrss.aspx?PostID=8552347</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=8552347</wfw:comment><description>In the DSL project I am working on, I am performing layout for the model diagram myself. This problem mostly arises because we want two-way synchronization between model and code. Hence, after one of our users has modified the diagram by hand, if we update...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/2008/05/26/auto-layout-diagram.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8552347" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/dsl+tools/default.aspx">dsl tools</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/visual+studio/default.aspx">visual studio</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/layout/default.aspx">layout</category></item><item><title>64 Bits and DSL Tools</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/2008/05/21/64-bits-and-dsl-tools.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 23:01:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8529458</guid><dc:creator>Vijai Kalyan</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/comments/8529458.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/commentrss.aspx?PostID=8529458</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=8529458</wfw:comment><description>The DSL projects created by the DSL package wizard are configured to target AnyCPU .However, if you write a command line tool that references the generated DSL library, you should set up your project to target x86 even if you are working on a 64-bit machine....(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/2008/05/21/64-bits-and-dsl-tools.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8529458" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/typeloadexception/default.aspx">typeloadexception</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/64+bit/default.aspx">64 bit</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/dsl+tools/default.aspx">dsl tools</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/visual+studio/default.aspx">visual studio</category></item><item><title>DTE Events Are Different</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/2008/04/30/dte-events-are-different.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 06:56:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8446178</guid><dc:creator>Vijai Kalyan</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/comments/8446178.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/commentrss.aspx?PostID=8446178</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=8446178</wfw:comment><description>As I learned today, DTE events are different. Event handlers that are local are marked for garbage collection when the handler goes out of scope. That means the event handler is likely to be fired at most once or never....(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/2008/04/30/dte-events-are-different.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8446178" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/event/default.aspx">event</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/visual/default.aspx">visual</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/collection/default.aspx">collection</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/garbage/default.aspx">garbage</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/studio/default.aspx">studio</category></item><item><title>Modifying the Item Context Menu</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/2008/04/29/modifying-the-item-context-menu.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:50:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8441815</guid><dc:creator>Vijai Kalyan</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/comments/8441815.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/commentrss.aspx?PostID=8441815</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=8441815</wfw:comment><description>I was trying to implement an AddIn that modified the context menu for project items. Specifically, C# files. After poking around for a couple of hours, I succeeded. Adding a menu item (or CommandBarControl) is relatively simple. What was complicated was...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/2008/04/29/modifying-the-item-context-menu.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8441815" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Visual Studio Project Creation Wizard and Templates</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/2008/04/28/visual-studio-project-creation-wizard-and-templates.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:05:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8435853</guid><dc:creator>Vijai Kalyan</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/comments/8435853.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/commentrss.aspx?PostID=8435853</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=8435853</wfw:comment><description>I found an interesting feature when creating a Visual Studio project template. (Details about how to create a template is left to a forthcoming post.) I was working on a wizard for the project template. In the IWizard::RunStarted method for the wizard,...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/2008/04/28/visual-studio-project-creation-wizard-and-templates.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8435853" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/updownroundnround/archive/tags/visual+studio+template+wizard+replacement+parameter/default.aspx">visual studio template wizard replacement parameter</category></item></channel></rss>