<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Regions and high Availability</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/velocity/archive/2009/04/15/regions-and-high-availability.aspx</link><description>When talking to some customers and partners, there was some confusion regarding regions and high availability. There is a assumption that if you use regions you will not get High Availability. That is not correct - High Availability is orthogonal to whether</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Summary 17.04.2009 &amp;ndash; 19.04.2009 &amp;laquo;  Bogdan Brinzarea&amp;#8217;s blog</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/velocity/archive/2009/04/15/regions-and-high-availability.aspx#9558665</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:51:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9558665</guid><dc:creator>Summary 17.04.2009 &amp;ndash; 19.04.2009 &amp;laquo;  Bogdan Brinzarea&amp;#8217;s blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://bogdanbrinzarea.wordpress.com/2009/04/21/summary-17042009-19042009/"&gt;http://bogdanbrinzarea.wordpress.com/2009/04/21/summary-17042009-19042009/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>