<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Virtual PC vs. Power Management</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/virtual_pc_guy/archive/2005/09/19/471612.aspx</link><description>It seems that people are constantly running into problems running Virtual PC on laptop systems with advanced power management. The reason for this is that Virtual PC is very demanding on hardware and has very strict timing requirements - and as each new</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Virtual PC vs. Power Management</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/virtual_pc_guy/archive/2005/09/19/471612.aspx#471629</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 07:46:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:471629</guid><dc:creator>James McNellis</dc:creator><description>Question:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Would it help to create a custom power scheme using the powercfg command (XP SP2 or 2003 only)?  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This command lets you set the processor-throttle-ac and -dc to none.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=324347"&gt;http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=324347&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Any thoughts on this?</description></item><item><title>re: Virtual PC vs. Power Management</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/virtual_pc_guy/archive/2005/09/19/471612.aspx#471722</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 14:51:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:471722</guid><dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator><description>I was excited when I saw this post as I have been tormented by what I call the &amp;quot;CPU Blitz&amp;quot; since I first started using VP on my Dell Latitude D600. I downloaded and installed every driver I could find on dell.com. I installed Windows XP SP2. In installed a patch I got from Microsoft support. I installed SpeedswitchXP. Nothing helped.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;After reading your post today, I installed seti@home and set it to work. Then I started three VMs planning to run a build in each VM, something that usually triggers the blitz. I never got that far as my CPU stepped down to 600 MHz before the third VM finished booting.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is driving me crazy! Do you have any suggestions?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mark</description></item><item><title>re: Virtual PC vs. Power Management</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/virtual_pc_guy/archive/2005/09/19/471612.aspx#471723</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 14:55:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:471723</guid><dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator><description>Sorry. I should have asked if you have any more suggestions. I think that I have tried everything you suggested in your original post.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thank you,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mark</description></item><item><title>re: Virtual PC vs. Power Management</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/virtual_pc_guy/archive/2005/09/19/471612.aspx#471928</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 22:15:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:471928</guid><dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator><description>An update:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I suspended seti@home because since I installed it, my CPU steps down from 1.7GHz to 600MHz within 30 minutes after I boot. IOW, it has the opposite effect on my system that intended. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When I can carve a day or two out of my schedule I plan to do a theraputic reinstall of Windows. I don't know what else to do.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mark</description></item><item><title>re: Virtual PC vs. Power Management</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/virtual_pc_guy/archive/2005/09/19/471612.aspx#472105</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2005 03:47:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:472105</guid><dc:creator>sj</dc:creator><description>Did you check for BIOS updates?  IIRC, that solved some issues that were reported in the vpc newsgroup.</description></item><item><title>re: Virtual PC vs. Power Management</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/virtual_pc_guy/archive/2005/09/19/471612.aspx#472168</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2005 07:21:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:472168</guid><dc:creator>DosFreak</dc:creator><description>You can try RMClock: &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://cpu.rightmark.org/products/rmclock.shtml"&gt;http://cpu.rightmark.org/products/rmclock.shtml&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;[quote]Dynamic on-demand clock modulation adjustment is supported on: &lt;br&gt;Intel Pentium M/Celeron M, Intel Pentium 4/Celeron (all cores), Intel Xeon (all cores), Intel Pentium D/Pentium Extreme Edition featuring On-Demand Clock Modulation (ODCM).[/quote]</description></item><item><title>re: Virtual PC vs. Power Management</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/virtual_pc_guy/archive/2005/09/19/471612.aspx#472257</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:30:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:472257</guid><dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator><description>Yes, I installed the latest BIOS update.</description></item><item><title>re: Virtual PC vs. Power Management</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/virtual_pc_guy/archive/2005/09/19/471612.aspx#472258</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:31:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:472258</guid><dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator><description>I visited the RMClock site. I don't understand how it could be configured to prevent the CPU slowing down. Can you explain?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mark</description></item><item><title>re: Virtual PC vs. Power Management</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/virtual_pc_guy/archive/2005/09/19/471612.aspx#472263</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:54:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:472263</guid><dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator><description>I installed RMClock. I confess that I don't have a clue about what most of the settings mean. It sounds like I need to read the Pentium M documentation in order to understand what to do and I think it would be way over my head.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What I want is for my Pentium M CPU to *not* slow down randomly. I want to do that without damaging the CPU. I am definitely concerned that I could screw something up and damage my CPU.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Can anyone advise me? I feel the same way about the settings in SpeedswitchXP.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thank you,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mark</description></item><item><title>re: Virtual PC vs. Power Management</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/virtual_pc_guy/archive/2005/09/19/471612.aspx#482854</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 02:57:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:482854</guid><dc:creator>Luther Miller</dc:creator><description>This is interesting - I perceived the problem to be the VPC processing too fast - for example, when I held down ALT-TAB, it flipped through applications at light speed. However, I am also experiencing the problem on a Dell D600 laptop intermittmently when the laptop is plugged into AC power and when running on batteries, so I will try changing some power management options - although I believe it already has the latest firmware as well as Dell PM drivers etc.</description></item></channel></rss>