<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>More on LINQ (by yag)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/vsdata/archive/2005/09/15/Linq-Links.aspx</link><description>Here are some links to various reactions and interviews on The Linq Project. Visual Basic 9.0: Looking Forward - This is an interview that a number of us had with Dr. Dobbs Journal while here at PDC. Check out the transcript of the discussion with Amanda</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: More on LINQ (by yag)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/vsdata/archive/2005/09/15/Linq-Links.aspx#467823</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2005 22:15:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:467823</guid><dc:creator>Roger Jennings</dc:creator><description>I believe it would have saved VB 2005 developers substantial time and frustration if MSFT LINQ blogs had mentioned this item from the Dr. Dobb's journal:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;Amanda [Silver]: For example, we've been working on XML integration pretty fiercely, meanwhile, we're [VB Data] don't have support in this initial version for DLinq.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;--rj&lt;br&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>