Your Websites, Our Passion!

PingBack from http://www.travel-hilarity.com/airline_travel/?p=1338

"I found annotating the library with a few XML Doc Comments..."

That is actually _not_ a positive selling point! Who's gonna write comments for a javascript framework that they use in order to get some intellisense?

You've been kicked (a good thing) - Trackback from DotNetKicks.com

How about a fix for prototype.js too?

Great stuff! Love to see IntelliSense improving like this!

@Mike : What's the disadvantage of having the OPTION to do this? For some development teams it might make sense to have a dev version of the library with comments for intellisense support. You could always change refs to packed or gzipped version for deployment.

Geez.  What the heck is 'jscript'?  Would you people get over yourselves please?  It's *JAVASCRIPT*.  That's what we are using on the front-lines.  NOT JSCRIPT, whatever the heck that is.

It's just another example of why we programmers are so frustrated w/Microsoft.  Frankly, if it wasn't for Scott Guthrie and his MVC.NET, many of us would start jumping to a platform w/a better IDE (2005 stinks the big one), and better support (ie, COMPATIBILITY and the realization that the net is NOT a Microsoft world and never will be).  Too much innovation happens outside of your very high fences, folks.

So get with the program, please and start acknowledging INDUSTRY STANDARDS!  

The hotfix mentioned in a previous post of mine among the things that it fixed, was an intellisense problem

Great job, I am glad to see intellisense support working for JQuery.  Good job!

Javascript, JScript, Script, oh my!

Okay, not exactly on topic, but I've always found Visual Studio to be the best IDE I've ever used. Visual Studio is a large part of why I got hooked on  Microsoft technology. It has its quirks but they have never prevented me from accomplishing my job.

As far as I'm concerned, keep up the great work!

There seems to be allot of interest with ASP.NET Developers doing DOM manipulation with JQuery there

There seems to be allot of interest with ASP.NET Developers doing DOM manipulation with JQuery there

You mentionned working on prototype... is ExtJS also in the pipeline? The company I work for is considering it, but we don't really want to use something that won't play well with javascript intellisense...

We are working on ExtJS support right now. We haven't identified the problem yet, but looks like it is related to our simulated DOM. We will post as soon as we get it working (or if we cannot get it working).

Hi Jeff, this is really cool.  Starting with your example, I went through and <a href="http://lancefisher.net/blog/archive/2008/02/12/intellisense-for-jquery-in-visual-studio-2008.aspx">commented the jQuery library</a>.  I added comments for most everything, but there are still a few gaps.  You can download the .js from my blog.

Thanks for the quick answer. Btw, as an only semi-related sidenote, I'm quite enjoying the increased updates and transparency when it comes to VS2008, as opposed to what we had during the 2003 and 2005 days. Keep it up!

"@Mike : What's the disadvantage of having the OPTION to do this? For some development teams it might make sense to have a dev version of the library with comments for intellisense support. You could always change refs to packed or gzipped version for deployment."

Sure some will do it, but that's not my point. It's the IDEA that is backwards, USERS adding comments to LIBRARIES they USE just to support their IDE. I hope the Open AJAX alliance will come up with a solution for this soon. Some kind of standard hooks EVERY IDE can use.

"However, it's technically a Sun trademark (see http://www.sun.com/suntrademarks/index.jsp) and--as an employee of another large software company--I just try to be careful."

Amazing, I thought Netscape developed it? How did Sun get the trademark? Anyway, I never liked the term JScript either (also easy to confuse with JScript.NET), but at least now we know why you guys do it.

@Mike : Very good point about a possible standards hook. I had not looked into the Open AJAX Alliance previously, so your comment got me looking at it. Thanks

For now though, I don’t think it’s necessarily a problem for users to put effort in to get intellisense support if they want it (I won’t, just thinking some teams will). This isn’t an exact parallel, but jQuery itself uses some custom selectors which aren't part of a standard, but are included because they are useful right now: http://docs.jquery.com/DOM/Traversing/Selectors#Custom_Selectors

Wikipedia has a little bit of history about Java/Javascript/JScript/ECMAScript:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JavaScript

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECMAScript

The initial version of JScript was fairly different from the initial version of Javascript. At some point, a standard named ECMAScript was written and both implementations now conform to that.

一週間近く遅れていますが、VS 2008 で適用できるホットフィックスが登場しています。 Web デザイナ周りのパフォーマンス改善やフィックスです。 詳しい内容等は、 ScottGu's Blog を翻訳している

Wonderful news for all jQuery-Fans like me. Thanks a lot...

JQuery IntelliSense in Visual Studio 2008

I've just put together a tool that reflects over the JQuery API and uses the published JQuery XML documentation to build up a stub file containing intellisense comments for JQuery. I've blogged about how you can use a stub like that to override the real JQuery with annotated stubs for intellisense here: http://blogs.ipona.com/james/archive/2008/02/15/JQuery-IntelliSense-in-Visual-Studio-2008.aspx

For a number of reasons to do with how JQuery's implemented, this approach seems to be the best way to get good quality intellisense throughout JQuery's API. And now that VS2008 intellisense keeps working even when it comes across the jQuery sourcecode, you can use a trick like this without any problem.

Am I missing something?  I just applied the Hotfix.  I have my custom JQuery code for one of my Views in it's own .js file being referenced by the .aspx page.  I try to add a debug point in my .js file that contains my custom JQuery for the View.  When I run it using the VS 2008 built-in web server, it never hits the debug point.  I also try to use Intellisense in that .js file and it doesn't do a thing for me.

Maybe I just don't know how to do this right or maybe it just doesn't work in a .js file and you have to inline your JQuery code right into the .aspx for debugging or Intellisense to work?

Here is the latest in my link-listing series .&#160; Also check out my ASP.NET Tips, Tricks and Tutorials

Here is the latest in my link-listing series .&#160; Also check out my ASP.NET Tips, Tricks and Tutorials

【原文地址】 Feb 17th Links: ASP.NET, ASP.NET AJAX, Visual Studio, .NET 【原文发表日期】 Sunday, February 17, 2008

Colegamenti del 17 Febbraio: ASP.NET, ASP.NET AJAX, Visual Studio, .NET

Here is the latest in my link-listing series .&#160; Also check out my ASP.NET Tips, Tricks and Tutorials

ALan is talking out of his swanny - find me a better IDE than VS and I use it that simple - Jscript - Javascript Alan you so petty.

First of all, sorry for my bad english..

I don't know, how far goes your experience with jQuery, so I'll try hard to make this self-explained.

In jQuery there are some functions that can get or set a value of a css propertie, or an html attribute of the object in question.

Some good examples are the functions width(), height(), css("property"), attr("attribute")..

If you type $(object).width(), you get the value, and $(object).width( val ), you set, of course.

But the problem is how intellisense handles this, since a function like this can return a string, or the jQuery object itfself, allowing you too continue setting other attributes for this same object, like:

$(object).width(val).height(val).css("attribute", "val")

In case you are GETTING the height of the object, for example, intellisense should stop showing after that.

But, if you are SETTING, it should continue working.

A great idea, I guess, is to allow us to define multiple definitions for the same function, like in C# intellisense, choosing one with those cool little arrows.

Something like:

definition

 summary /

 param /

 return type="jQuery" /

/definition

definition

 summary /

 param /

 return type="string" /

/definition

Anyway, thanks for the work so far.

Dear Scott:

How about the edition for chinese?  

When ?

Hi,

Waiting for you prototype.js fix.:)

Here is the latest in my link-listing series .&#160; Also check out my ASP.NET Tips, Tricks and Tutorials

I'm slowly recovering from keynoting at MIX last week, and have been digging my way out of backlogged

I'm slowly recovering from keynoting at MIX last week, and have been digging my way out of backlogged

I&#39;m slowly recovering from keynoting at MIX last week, and have been digging my way out of backlogged

I knew it was possible, was wondering if or when it would be available. JQuery Intellisense.

We use prototype.js and have been using it for years now. I love the intellisense for js and it's too bad it doesn't work for prototype.

But is it a flaw in prototype.js or VS? Can the prototype crew fix this themselves?

JeffKing,who'soneoftheprogrammanagersintheWebToolDivisionandwhofocusesontheJavaScr...

JScriptIntelliSense:WorkingwithjQuery

WehavegoodnewsforjQueryfans.

Visual Studio 2008 SP1 Beta is now available! You can download it here . In SP1, we have added some new