<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>[SQL Server 2005] TEMPDB optimization</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/weix/archive/2005/09/13/464907.aspx</link><description>In SQL 2005 we have done quite a bit of internal improvements in tempdb scalability. These include: Caching of IAM and first data page for temp table and table variables. Improved allocation page latching protocol so that we use UP latch less frequently.</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>TEMPDB optimizations for SQL Server 2005 - Help your XML Datatype performance!</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/weix/archive/2005/09/13/464907.aspx#465002</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2005 22:43:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:465002</guid><dc:creator>John Gallardo's Weblog</dc:creator><description>&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/weix/archive/2005/09/13/464907.aspx"&gt;http://blogs.msdn.com/weix/archive/2005/09/13/464907.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wei mentions a couple of optimizations that...</description></item><item><title>TEMPDB optimizations for SQL Server 2005 - Help your XML Datatype performance!</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/weix/archive/2005/09/13/464907.aspx#466129</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 18:42:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:466129</guid><dc:creator>John Gallardo's Weblog</dc:creator><description>&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/weix/archive/2005/09/13/464907.aspx"&gt;http://blogs.msdn.com/weix/archive/2005/09/13/464907.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wei mentions a couple of optimizations that...</description></item><item><title>Reduce the Contention on tempdb with Trace Flag 1118: To Enable, or Not to Enable?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/weix/archive/2005/09/13/464907.aspx#4276244</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 14:41:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4276244</guid><dc:creator>Linchi Shea</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;A recently published KB article Q936185 seems to contradict the recommendation of using trace flag 1118&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>