A Model for Query Interpretation

Community Convergence XVI

Charlie Calvert's Community Blog — Sat, 30 Dec 2006 03:55:48 GMT

Welcome to the sixteenth Community Convergence. This column comes out about once a week and is designed

Community Convergence XVI

Charlie Calvert's Community Blog — Sat, 30 Dec 2006 03:56:15 GMT

Welcome to the sixteenth Community Convergence. This column comes out about once a week and is designed

Community Convergence XVI

Charlie Calvert's Community Blog — Sat, 30 Dec 2006 04:17:27 GMT

Welcome to the sixteenth Community Convergence. This column comes out about once a week and is designed

How Linq to Objects Queries Work

Yet Another Language Geek — Wed, 03 Jan 2007 04:40:27 GMT

If you have ever tried to step through a Linq to Objects query in the debugger, you may have been mildly

Wes Dyers' reports from the C# compiler front

Linq in Action News — Mon, 08 Jan 2007 14:34:10 GMT

If you are the kind of guy fascinated by the C# language and LINQ who wants to know more about what's

Wes Dyers' reports from the C# compiler front

Fabrice's weblog — Mon, 08 Jan 2007 14:34:13 GMT

If you are the kind of guy fascinated by the C# language and LINQ who wants to know more about what's

Wes Dyers' reports from the C# compiler front

Fabrice's weblog — Mon, 08 Jan 2007 14:36:43 GMT

If you are the kind of guy fascinated by the C# language and LINQ who wants to know more about what's

Another Model for Query Interpretation

Yet Another Language Geek — Mon, 08 Jan 2007 22:59:21 GMT

An imperative model for interpreting Linq to Objects queries has already been discussed , but are there

About Queries

Yet Another Language Geek — Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:14:37 GMT

This concludes my series of posts about queries. I will still discuss them occassionally and if anyone

About Queries

Yet Another Language Geek — Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:25:35 GMT

This concludes my series of posts about queries. I will still discuss them occassionally and if anyone

re: A Model for Query Interpretation

Bradley Grainger — Mon, 12 Feb 2007 22:13:39 GMT

A co-worker just sent me a link to your blog, and I've been working through your archived posts (using the January Orcas CTP).

In your second example of bindings, you have:

orderby x descending, y descending

[(x:3,y:3),(x:2,y:2),(x:2,y:3)]

select x + y

6,4,5

If it's sorting by x (descending), then by y (descending), shouldn't that be:

orderby x descending, y descending

[(x:3,y:3),(x:2,y:3),(x:2,y:2)]

select x + y

6,5,4

Thanks for some very interesting and informative articles!

re: A Model for Query Interpretation

wesdyer — Mon, 12 Feb 2007 22:47:12 GMT

Yes, you are absolutely right. Thanks for the catch.

Glad you are enjoying it.

re: A Model for Query Interpretation

Tanveer Badar — Mon, 04 Jun 2007 13:57:56 GMT

Are there any plans to ship a LINQ to objects query planner?

Would the compilers (C# and VB) will be modified so they always do .Where( ... ) before anything else in the expression tree?

re: A Model for Query Interpretation

Tom Kirby-Green — Mon, 04 Jun 2007 15:00:19 GMT

I would imagine that the P-LINQ (Parallel LINQ) project would have to include such a query planner in order to determine if-at-all / how-to best distribute a LINQ to Objects query over the available CPU cores.