<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Tao of the Windows Installer, Part 5</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/windows_installer_team/archive/2006/07/28/681358.aspx</link><description>Testing is a vital part of the package development process and you can avoid many problems in production if your testing strategy is sound. So this time we will look at a couple of pointers on testing. I must admit I'm less happy with the arrangement</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Tao of the Windows Installer, Part 5</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/windows_installer_team/archive/2006/07/28/681358.aspx#682038</link><pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2006 02:34:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:682038</guid><dc:creator>Phil Wilson </dc:creator><description>I think the testing rule is probably outside the topic (which I think is how to design an MSI setup that works, is robust, can be serviced, and won't come back later in some way to bite you). &lt;br&gt;Given that there are 50+ rules, I'm wondering if they need categorising by priority rather than by area. Some are more important to follw than others, I think that's true to say. </description></item><item><title>re: Tao of the Windows Installer, Part 5</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/windows_installer_team/archive/2006/07/28/681358.aspx#682675</link><pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2006 20:32:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:682675</guid><dc:creator>Windows Installer Team</dc:creator><description>&lt;STRONG&gt;"I'm wondering if they need categorising by priority rather than by area" &lt;BR&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;Placing them in order of importance is likely to lead to a lot of argument - look at the comments from &lt;A href="http://blogs.msdn.com/windows_installer_team/archive/2006/05/01/587990.aspx"&gt;Part 1&lt;/A&gt;; &amp;nbsp;with only a few rules listed there was already disagreement over what was most important. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;As I mentioned before, &lt;EM&gt;Rule 1&lt;/EM&gt; is the only one that is in order of importance - if you follow that then you'll avoid a lot of problems anyway. &amp;nbsp;Apart from that the rules were intended be read in any order. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;However, I agree that there is a need for a better arrangement. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;
&lt;DIV id=CSBloggerSig&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT color=#969696 size=1&gt;[Author: Richard Macdonald]&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=1&gt;This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.&lt;/FONT&gt; &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Tao of the Windows Installer, Part 5</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/windows_installer_team/archive/2006/07/28/681358.aspx#684086</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 16:47:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:684086</guid><dc:creator>Megh Neupane</dc:creator><description>I think you can categorize Rule 53 as two parts: &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;=&amp;gt; Pre-UAT&lt;br&gt;This can include the 4 points you have mentioned. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;=&amp;gt; UAT&lt;br&gt;You can have more categories here instead of scrambling points to 1 topic. For e.g. Test Environment, Prod Environment...This references a direct success from the Pre-UAT functionality testing and above all, user requirements (customization) and application stability. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;These two sections are best suitable for Re-packaging applications from legacy installs. I have been following this procedure for some years now and it eventually leads you to &amp;quot;distinct&amp;quot; package errors and &amp;quot;very close to&amp;quot; repackaging success. </description></item><item><title>re: Tao of the Windows Installer, Part 5</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/windows_installer_team/archive/2006/07/28/681358.aspx#684250</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 19:50:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:684250</guid><dc:creator>Mike Dimmick</dc:creator><description>I think you're mixing together rules for developers, rules for administrators wanting to make use of Windows Installer technology to deploy applications, and rules for administrators wanting to repackage applications built with older technologies. The first and second groups don't really overlap, while the third overlaps somewhat with both. I think it might be better to have a set of rules for developers, a set for administrators, and point the third group at both sets, with a few extra rules for them.</description></item><item><title>re: Tao of the Windows Installer, Part 5</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/windows_installer_team/archive/2006/07/28/681358.aspx#684996</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 10:52:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:684996</guid><dc:creator>EdShepley</dc:creator><description>I like the idea of the rules for everyone being in the same place. At least then there should be less ambiguity in the business about where to get your help and advice from.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On the subject of &amp;quot;categorising by priority rather than by area&amp;quot;, I agree that a by area approach seems sensible and by priority could lead to a ruckus, but how about marking each rule as 'strict' or 'preferred'?</description></item><item><title>re: Tao of the Windows Installer, Part 5</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/windows_installer_team/archive/2006/07/28/681358.aspx#760793</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 17:04:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:760793</guid><dc:creator>Moses</dc:creator><description>Is there any special ICE warnings that MAY be ignored? I am working on an msi package and I have a number of ICE 33 warnings that seem to result from some merge modules that I integrate in my msi. I have no errors, but I have a series of warnings such as:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;**********************&lt;br&gt;Reg key Global_Controls_MSADODataOcx_r17.7EBEDD1B_AA66_11D2_B980_006097C4DE24 is used in an unsupported way. This key need not be written as it already exists in the system.	ice33.html	Registry	Registry	Global_Controls_MSADODataOcx_r17.7EBEDD1B_AA66_11D2_B980_006097C4DE24&lt;br&gt;Evaluation: ICE33&lt;br&gt;*****************************&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am still fairly new to windows installer and I am definitely taking rule# 1 seriously. However, in case someone has a clue how to sort this out, let me know.&lt;br&gt;Cheers,&lt;br&gt;Moses&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Tao of the Windows Installer, Part 6</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/windows_installer_team/archive/2006/07/28/681358.aspx#761229</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 00:50:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:761229</guid><dc:creator>Windows Installer Team Blog</dc:creator><description>Well, here we are with the last part in this series, where we'll be looking at security in relation to...</description></item><item><title>929  &amp;raquo; Blog Archive   &amp;raquo; Hogyan haszn??ljuk a Windows Installert</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/windows_installer_team/archive/2006/07/28/681358.aspx#793435</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 13:54:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:793435</guid><dc:creator>929  » Blog Archive   » Hogyan haszn??ljuk a Windows Installert</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://929.hu/blog/?p=113"&gt;http://929.hu/blog/?p=113&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Windows Installer - kust alustada?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/windows_installer_team/archive/2006/07/28/681358.aspx#834656</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 14:51:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:834656</guid><dc:creator>DT blogi</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Windows Installeriga on k&amp;#252;llaltki keerukas algajal otsi lahti teha. Mul endalgi on &amp;#252;ks installer k&amp;#228;sil ja t&amp;#228;nu keerukamale funktsionaalsusele, mida see peab pakkuma, tuli ka rohkem s&amp;#252;veneda Windows Installeri hingeellu. Leidsin internetis ringi tu...&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Software Information &amp;raquo; Windows Installer Team Blog : Tao of the Windows Installer Part 1</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/windows_installer_team/archive/2006/07/28/681358.aspx#7242426</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:41:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7242426</guid><dc:creator>Software Information » Windows Installer Team Blog : Tao of the Windows Installer Part 1</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://softwareinformation.247blogging.info/windows-installer-team-blog-tao-of-the-windows-installer-part-1/"&gt;http://softwareinformation.247blogging.info/windows-installer-team-blog-tao-of-the-windows-installer-part-1/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Software Information &amp;raquo; Windows Installer Team Blog : Tao of the Windows Installer Part 5</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/windows_installer_team/archive/2006/07/28/681358.aspx#7244287</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 21:38:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7244287</guid><dc:creator>Software Information » Windows Installer Team Blog : Tao of the Windows Installer Part 5</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://softwareinformation.247blogging.info/windows-installer-team-blog-tao-of-the-windows-installer-part-5/"&gt;http://softwareinformation.247blogging.info/windows-installer-team-blog-tao-of-the-windows-installer-part-5/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Copyright Revewals &amp;raquo; Windows Installer Team Blog : Tao of the Windows Installer Part 5</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/windows_installer_team/archive/2006/07/28/681358.aspx#8350615</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 13:09:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8350615</guid><dc:creator>Copyright Revewals » Windows Installer Team Blog : Tao of the Windows Installer Part 5</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://copyrightrenewalsblog.info/windows-installer-team-blog-tao-of-the-windows-installer-part-5/"&gt;http://copyrightrenewalsblog.info/windows-installer-team-blog-tao-of-the-windows-installer-part-5/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>