<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>(Driver Signing &amp;lt;&amp;gt; Kernel Patch Protection) AND (KPP &amp;lt;&amp;gt; Driver Signing)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/windowsvistasecurity/archive/2007/08/16/driver-signing-kernel-patch-protection-and-kpp-driver-signing.aspx</link><description>So I am reading a lot of stories that seem to have confused, or incorrectly aligned, Windows Vista driver signing and Kernel Patch Protection technologies. Whilst driver signing and KPP are complimentary, they are not conjoined. Driver signing provides</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>  Microsoft precisa la differenza tra le patch kernel per i driver firmati e il problema &amp;#8216;in se&amp;#8217; dei driver firmati &amp;raquo; PuntoDiVista - Il pi?? grande blog monotematico su Windows Vista</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/windowsvistasecurity/archive/2007/08/16/driver-signing-kernel-patch-protection-and-kpp-driver-signing.aspx#4413822</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:47:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4413822</guid><dc:creator>  Microsoft precisa la differenza tra le patch kernel per i driver firmati e il problema ‘in se’ dei driver firmati » PuntoDiVista - Il pi?? grande blog monotematico su Windows Vista</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://puntodivista.mirkotebaldi.it/2007/08/16/microsoft-precisa-la-differenza-tra-le-patch-kernel-per-i-driver-firmati-e-il-problema-in-se-dei-driver-firmati/"&gt;http://puntodivista.mirkotebaldi.it/2007/08/16/microsoft-precisa-la-differenza-tra-le-patch-kernel-per-i-driver-firmati-e-il-problema-in-se-dei-driver-firmati/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: (Driver Signing &lt;&gt; Kernel Patch Protection) AND (KPP &lt;&gt; Driver Signing)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/windowsvistasecurity/archive/2007/08/16/driver-signing-kernel-patch-protection-and-kpp-driver-signing.aspx#5270018</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 04:41:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:5270018</guid><dc:creator>AGOSTINHO SILVA</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;O MICROST WINDOWS DEIXOU DE PROCESSAR TEXTO. PORQU&amp;#202;?&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: (Driver Signing &lt;&gt; Kernel Patch Protection) AND (KPP &lt;&gt; Driver Signing)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/windowsvistasecurity/archive/2007/08/16/driver-signing-kernel-patch-protection-and-kpp-driver-signing.aspx#5371409</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 23:40:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:5371409</guid><dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Okay, this is not regarding this topic but still security related. Can MS update SYSKEY in Vista SP1 so that it natively supports USB flash drives? Almost all computers support USB, even booting from USB and mine came without a floppy, so I'm forced to store SAM locally. Hopefully, implementing this will be a small change and therefore MS will not let me down on this one.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>