Welcome to MSDN Blogs
Sign in
|
Join
|
Help
XPS Team Blog - XML Paper Specification and the Open Packaging Conventions
This Blog
Email
Syndication
RSS 2.0
Atom 1.0
Search
Blogs
Andy Simonds' Blog
Brian Jones' Blog
Feng Yuan's Blog
Ben Kuhn's Blog
Adrian Ford's Blog
Tags
No tags have been created or used yet.
Recent Posts
Printing and Document Features for the Platform Update for Windows Vista
New Office 2010 Printing Functionality
Hello Ecma-388 1st Edition
Announcing the Windows HD Imaging AQ
Get started with XPS APIs for document workflows
Archives
September 2009 (1)
July 2009 (2)
May 2009 (1)
April 2009 (2)
March 2009 (1)
November 2008 (4)
October 2008 (1)
August 2008 (1)
August 2007 (1)
July 2007 (2)
May 2007 (2)
April 2007 (1)
February 2007 (2)
January 2007 (1)
November 2006 (1)
September 2006 (22)
July 2006 (1)
June 2006 (3)
May 2006 (2)
April 2006 (2)
March 2006 (3)
February 2006 (4)
January 2006 (1)
December 2005 (2)
November 2005 (3)
XPS v0.95 Available
Get your copy at the
XPS download website
. This is the XPS specification release candidate. At this moment, we anticipate only formatting changes and the addition of an index for 1.0. Check in with us at
xpsinfo@microsoft.com
if you have questions.
Published Monday, September 25, 2006 1:31 PM by
xps
Comments
Tuesday, September 26, 2006 1:26 PM by
Edward
#
re: XPS v0.95 Available
Will there be a list anywhere detailing all of the changes between 0.9 and 0.95? Having just learnt the spec inside and out I'm loathe to go trawling months of this blog or examine the spec again from scratch.
Tuesday, September 26, 2006 4:02 PM by
xps
#
re: XPS v0.95 Available
All changes were posted in July and September. The blog here is the only list of changes.
Wednesday, September 27, 2006 6:10 AM by
Edward
#
re: XPS v0.95 Available
Do you mean all changes were posted in this blog in July and September? I was just hoping for a formal list somewhere that summarised it all. I was going to do a merge on the Word documents and find out that way, but I notice the Word version of the spec has been dropped..
One of the reasons I ask is, there was a subtle mistake I found in the 0.9 spec a few days ago, perhaps too minor to warrant an entry on this blog, but I'd hoped it was corrected, along with other minor errors too. Having just checked though, I see that it unfortunately hasn't been corrected:
//
2.1.7.3 - Embedded font obfuscation
1. Generate a 128-bit GUID (Globally Unique Identifier) for the font to be obfuscated. Instead of a true GUID, a 128-bit random number MAY be used [O2.21]. The 16 bytes of the 128-bit GUID are referred to in the following text by the placeholder names B00, B01, B02, B03; B10, B11; B20, B21; B20, B31, B32, B33, B34, B35, B36, and B37
//
The second B20 should be B30.
New Comments to this post are disabled